"Half Moon" - Bahman Ghobadi (2006)

Kurdish Iranian filmmaker Bahman Ghobadi’s fourth feature film, Half Moon (Niwemang, 2006) picks up the themes and the essential narrative elements from his earlier Marooned in Iraq (2002). Again there is the story of a legendary Kurdish musician living in Iran who wishes to make the journey over the mountains into Iraq in order to perform at a concert. Again, the story of this journey is a curious mixture of local Kurdish color, broad comedy, and final tragedy. But this time Ghobadi has ventured further along his own road of personal film expression. In particular, he has moved more firmly into the realm of magical realism, similar to that popularised by Latin American writers (and occasionally used by some other Iranian filmmakers).

Ghobadi has generally explored three basic themes or messages in his films:
  1. Kurdish culture, particularly its music
  2. The cruelty of political borders that artificially separate people of a common culture
  3. The barbarous and unjust way women are oppressed by the laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
In this film, he emphasizes these three themes with more vehemence and with more artistic liberties than he has done in the past.

The story begins with a vivid portrayal of a cockfight in a local Kurdish village, which is interrupted when the cockfight’s ringmaster, Kako, receives a cell phone call from his father, Mamo. Mamo, we soon learn, is an aging, but still revered, Kurdish singer who wishes to travel back to Iraq in order to perform there at a concert. This will be the first opportunity in over 35 years for Kurdish musicians to perform publicly in Iraq, and Mamo has been preparing for this occasion for seven months. So he commands his offspring (there appear to be at least ten sons and a daughter) to accompany him, since they will be needed as instrumental backup musicians. Taking with them their traditional stringed and percussive instruments, they all pile onto an old school bus that they have borrowed and drive away, with Kako at the wheel.

Against the warnings and concerns of his assembled sons, Mamo also wishes to bring along a woman singer, Hesho, who he says has a “celestial voice”. He manages to find Hesho in a village where she is one of 1334 women singers who have been confined there apparently because of their past singing in public. Once he gets Hesho on board, there is another problem: how can he conceal her from the Iranian authorities at the border. It is forbidden in Iran from a woman to travel on the roads with men who are not her relations. Their bus is stopped at the border, where the corrupt and thuggish border patrol soldiers search the bus for contraband and for any women (they have a dog that is specially trained to sniff for women). After a lengthy shakedown during which the soldiers trash their instruments, the musicians come to the realization that the Iranian authorities have no intention of ever letting them travel into Iraq. Nevertheless, obeying the commands of the determined Mamo, they press on and decide to taken an alternative route by travelling along the border awhile and then entering Turkey first before going into Iraq. Mamo is happy about this new route, because it will give him an opportunity to hook up with another famous old Kurdish musician and comrade, Kak Khalil. However, when they get to Khailil’s village, they learn that he has just died, and so they attend his funeral burial.

When Khalil’s body is placed into the open grave, Mamo sees the dead body quiver, apparently in response to the voice of a woman singer that Mamo has heard during the burial. He insists that Khalil must still be alive, but he is assured by the village doctor that Khalil is indeed dead. Mamo is so disheartened by the death of his friend, that he appears to lose his will to continue. But while travelling on in their bus, the troupe encounters a mysterious, beautiful woman who announces that she will assist them in their quest to get to Iraq. It is clear that this woman, whose name is “Niwemang” (“Half Moon”) is not a being of this world and must be an angel or a Sufic spirit. Her ensuing efforts to help Mamo and his sons avoid further thuggery at the hands of the Turkish police and to get to their concert do indeed possibly achieve their goal in some higher realm – but not in this here-and-now world.

Half Moon is a very uneven film, with significant weaknesses and strengths. In general, although this film when compared to Marooned in Iraq is more philosophically ambitious, it is Marooned in Iraq that was the more successful narrative telling. We have to allow Ghobadi some latitude, though, because he makes films in the most difficult conditions and circumstances. He has said that, for visual background purposes, he likes to film the Kurdish mountain scenes in the winter, but this undoubtedly makes the filming conditions more difficult. And once again, according to my understanding, he has run into problems with the Iranian authorities, and Half Moon has been banned from distribution in Iran. In the past he has been forced to spend his own money to make a film and then attempt to recoup the expenses afterwards, mostly from overseas distribution.

The absolute authority and dominance of the father characters in both Marooned in Iraq and Half Moon is emphasized, often to comedic effect. Both Mirza in Marooned in Iraq and Mamo in Half Moon respect women, but both of them seem to have had many wives (in Mamo’s case I make that guess simply on the basis of his many children). Mamo’s sons, many appearing to be at least in the late 40s, are quite subservient to their father’s wishes, and on those occasions when complete obedience is not forthcoming, Mamo is quite willing to shoot his own sons with a gun.

The mystical aspects of this film sit rather uncomfortably along side the brutally real conditions faced by the Kurdish travellers (and thus by the Kurdish people, in general). Throughout the film, Mamo has premonitions of his own death. For example, he is told that a local wise man has foretold his imminent death on this journey, and he has visions of his own coffin being dragged by a woman (this will turn out to be Niwemang). But these visions are rather mysterious, and they don’t contribute to an effective narrative buildup. Numbers are use in the film with probably deeper meanings, but I am not sure about their precise symbolic significance, such as , for example, the seven months that Mamo has be been preparing for the concert. I don’t know what the number 1334 might mean, but I note that a Turkish human rights commission released a report awhile ago saying that 1334 Kurdish villages have been forcibly evacuated or destroyed by ethnic cleansing operations in that country. The number 14 is discussed several times concerning whether it is lucky or unlucky. It must refer to the 14th day of the lunar month, which would be halfway through the month and therefore mark a Half Moon. Certainly the Kurdish people have yet to enjoy the radiance and splendour of a full moon shining on their fortunes, so “half moon” may be a reflection on this compromised condition.

Ghobadi works very carefully with his non-professional actors, and he always gets good performances. On this occasion, the acting was even better. Unlike his previous films, which were entirely staffed by non-professional actors, he did have two top professional actresses for this film. Hedye Tehrani, a leading Iranian actress, played Hesho and also helped produce the film. Golshifteh Farahani, who has also appeared in  Boutique (2003), Bab'Aziz (2005), and Ali Santouri (2007), played Niwemang. Both of these women have the ability to convey great sensitivity and passion merely through their eyes and facial expressions. The magnificent Allah-Morad Rashtian, who plays Kako, is apparently a musician in real life, not a professional actor, but he had starred previously in Marooned in Iraq. This marvellous performer is a unique cinematic personality – there is something brilliant about him – and his presence leaves a lasting impression. I look forward to his appearance in future Ghobadi productions.

Overall, the Kurdish music is the strongest and most moving aspect of the film, and I would have preferred to have more of it. A particularly strong example and the most stunning moment in the film is when Mamo retrieves Hesho from the village of 1334 women. This symbolic scene is a visual and musical master stroke – very contrived, but also stirring. It is also an exquisite needle with which to prick the Iranian social restrictions on women. According to Iranian rules, a woman may not sing in public, but a group of women, i.e. a women’s chorus, may perform in public. When Mamo goes to this penal colony, he is told that the women there are so skilled with their singing that they collectively sound like the voice of a single woman. And, yes, on the soundtrack for this scene, as they all sing together, we hear the voice of a single woman.
★★★

"Warning Shadows" - Arthur Robison (1923)

The artistic success of Dr. Arthur Robison’s Warning Shadows (Schatten – eine Nächtliche Halluzination, literally, “Shadows – a Nocturnal Hallucination”, 1923) is as much attributable to artistic designer Albin Grau and cameraman Fritz Arno Wagner as it is to the director. Paul Rotha, the eminent British film historian, had these words to say about it:
At the time of production in 1922, Warning Shadows was a remarkable achievement. Its purely psychological direction opened new attributes of the cinema. It was a rare instance of complete filmic unity, with the possible exception of the unnecessary roof-garden scene. The continuity of theme, the smooth development from one sequence into another, the gradual communication of the thoughts of the characters, were flawlessly presented. It carried an air of romance, of fantasy, of tragedy. Every filmic property for the expression of mood, for the creation of atmosphere, that was known at the time was used with imagination and intelligence. Its supreme value as an example of unity of purpose, of time, of place, of theme, cannot be over-estimated.
Robison, an American brought up in Germany, shot the film entirely without subtitles, a startling new technique. The titles seen in today’s prints were added by a zealous distributor. The ambiguity of the shadows in the film has a Freudian inspiration. The little illusionist steals shadows and opens the flood gates of the repressed unconscious desires of the other characters in the film, who suddenly start acting out their secret fantasies. In a phantasmagoria shadows temporarily replace living beings, who become for a time passive spectators. The pace of the film increases as it goes, and the slow rhythm of the opening is left far behind.

The Germanic fascination with shadows and mirror images, of which tradition Peter Schlemihl is an excellent example, is related to the horror of non-existence – a state of mind that seems to flourish during and after wars with massive deaths on the battlefield.

Lotte Eisner (The Haunted Screen) remarks:
Thanks to an exceptional vigour of inspiration, the characters in this film free themselves from the abstract uniformity imposed by Expressionism. They act with an almost animal intensity.
★★★

"Waxworks" - Paul Leni (1924)

Paul Leni, the director of Waxworks (1924), was an Expressionist painter who had worked with Max Reinhardt as a set designer and poster designer for the cinema. The essence of Waxworks is said to be taken from the German title of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1919), "Das Kabinett Des Dr. Caligari”: the German title of Waxworks was “Das Wachsfigurenkabinett”. It was supposed to be a deliberate amplification of the fairground ambience, but with a more skilful technique.

The screenplay was written by Henrik Galeen, who had also done the scripts for Murnau’s Nosferatu (1922) and Wegener’s The Golem (1920). Here, instead of one tyrant, Galeen gives us three tyrants, played by Emil Jannings, Conrad Veidt, and Werner Krauss. In three successive episodes based on the imaginations of a starving young poet after looking at past tyrants being exhibited in a houses of wax.

The film has been criticized as having a purely decorative style, but the imaginative depiction of tents with mysterious shadows, innumerable electric signs, the merry-go-round, and a gigantic wheel turning in a welter of lights, all of this multiplied by super-impositions which thread across the screen almost like a spider’s web, show how far the German cinema had come since the rather arid abstraction of the Caligari fairground. Lotte Eisner, discussing Leni in The Haunted Screen, remarks that the
architectural details in the first two episodes reveal Leni’s skill as a designer. The roundness of the Oriental cupolas has a lively counterpart in the heavy turbans worn by the caliph’s courtiers. When the town of Baghdad appears, all light transparent curves, it is flat like the little diagrammatic town in Caligari, which has often been compared to the architecture in the paintings of Lyonel Feininger.
Leni himself went so far as to say,
For my film Waxworks I have tried to create sets so stylized that they evidence no idea of reality. All it seeks to engender is an indescribable fluidity of light, moving shapes, shadows, lines, and curves.
Siegfried Kracauer (From Caligari to Hitler) observes that
Waxworks culminates in scenes which, exceeding their task of illustrating the plot, penetrate the nature of tyrannical pow3er. The insistence with which, during those years, pictorial imagination reverted to this subject indicates that the problem of absolute authority was an intrinsic concern of the collective mind.
In this regard it is interesting that Sergei Eisenstein loosely used Waxworks as a model for some of his sets in Ivan the Terrible (1944).

Of special interest in Waxworks, is the celebrated “Jack-the-Ripper” scene which brings the tyrant-image to its most spectacular expression. Kracauer calls it “a very short sequence which must be counted among the greatest achievements of film art.”

Leni went on to direct successfully in America, notably The Cat and the Canary (1927), before he died in 1929.
★★★

East Asian Film

Films of East Asia:

"Days of Being Wild" - Wong Kar Wai (1990)

With his second feature, Days of Being Wild (A Fei Zheng Chuan, which means literally, “The True Story of Ah Fei”, 1990), Wong Kar Wai clearly established his own unique style of cinematic expression. A cult was born. His first film, As Tears Go By (Wong Gok Ka Moon, 1988) had been a huge critical and commercial success, but its style was something of a hybrid. That earlier film had been a combination that mixed the stylistics of Hong Kong Triad Gangster films (derived from the Chinese Wuxia literature of legendary martial arts heroes) and his own emerging aesthetic of romantic longing. It was the gangster genre aspects of As Tears Go By that drew the big crowds, but it was probably Wong’s dramatic stylistics that helped it sweep the Hong Kong Film Academy Awards. With Days of Being Wild, the gangster characteristics moved to the background, and the loneliness of the broken heart moves to the fore. Certainly at that time the Hong Kong gangster film was in its heyday, and in that same year of 1990, one of its greatest films, John Woo’s Bullet in the Head was released. But after his first commercial success, Wong now apparently had the confidence to move away from the gangster genre and make films according to his own personal tastes. Starting with Days of Being Wild, Wong became truly the cinematic Maestro of the Broken Heart.

Like As Tears Go By and other popular Hong Kong films, Days of Being Wild was loaded with glamorous Hong Kong media personalities who double as both movie stars and popular recording artists. These included Leslie Cheung (Leslie Cheung Kwok-Wing), Any Lau (Andy Lau Tak-Wah), Jacky Cheung (Jacky Cheung Hok-Yau – he would appear in nine films that year, including a starring role in Bullet in the Head), Maggie Cheung (Zhāng Mànyù), and Carina Lau (Carina Lau Kar-ling). One should not underestimate the difficulty of making films in the big city – not the least of which is dealing with the real Hong Kong Triad gangsters, who have an unhealthy involvement in Hong Kong film production. For example during the shooting of Days of Being Wild, star actress Carina Lau was abducted and topless photos were taken of her (and later published) as punishment for having refused a Triad film offer. Such distractions notwithstanding, Wong further complicated the fliming process by initiating his now-characteristic practice of improvising on the set and not working from a prepared shooting script. This was also the first film for which he teamed up with the brilliant Australian cinematographer, Christopher Doyle. For Doyle, this was his first Chinese language film, and from here on he became Wong’s regular cinematographer (and perhaps also co-creator) , as well as doing the photography for other prominent Chinese directors, including Zhang Yimou and Chen Kaige. From the very beginning of Days of Being Wild, Doyle’s adroit cinematography of dynamic hand-held and close-in tracking shots creates an intense intimacy that will provide the dominant mood for the film.

The story is essentially a relentless visual examination of unrequited longing, missed connections, and loneliness, and the events presented are centred around the life of Yuddy York (Leslie Cheung), a self-centred playboy who takes pleasure in manipulating others. But the film is not so much about Yuddy as it is about all the people around him who believe their lives are only meaningful in his company. Yuddy simply provides the occasion for what seems to be their unavoidable fate of dependency and suffering. The plot, if you want to call it that, is set in 1960 and comprises five basic acts.
  1. Li-zhen and Yuddy. In the opening scene, before the movie titles, Yuddy is seen meeting and flirting with the beautiful Su Li-zhen (Maggie Cheung), who is working at a fast-food kiosk. Yuddy is arrogant, but Su Li-zhen is intrigued. After the title credits (whose rolling background scene, we will later learn, is a tropical forest in the Philippines), Yuddy reappears to flirt with Li-zhen some more, and he tells her that a specific, but arbitrary, minute that they spent together, 3:00, April 16, 1960, will persist forever in both their memories. Soon they are lovers in bed, and Li-zhen is clearly enamoured with the egotistical Yuddy, who spends much of his time obsessively combing his hair in the mirror and admiring himself. When she asks him to marry her, he refuses, and the crushed Li-zhen walks out.
  2. Lulu and Yuddy. Yuddy visits his Filipino stepmother, who was apparently a courtesan and now has enough money to spend it on gigolos. Disgusted with her dissolute life, Yuddy beats up her gold-digging boyfriend and then steals his girlfriend, Lulu (Carina Lau). Lulu is a beautiful go-go dancer, and she, too, falls immediately for Yuddy. Yuddy spends much of his time smoking in bed, pouting, and posturing himself like the cool dude that he fashions himself to be. The two beautiful girls seem to love it, though. Without much explanation or motivation, Yuddy’s pal, Zeb (Jacky Cheung) shows up for awhile, long enough for us to see that he is hopelessly attracted to Lulu, and then departs.
  3. Li-zhen and Tide. We now go back to the torch-holding Li-zhen, who we learn has been spending her time lurking outside of Yuddy’s apartment, hoping to run into him. She meets a beat cop, Tide, and they become friends and spend a long time discussing how to cure Li-zhen of her obsessive infatuation for Yuddy.
  4. Lulu and Yuddy again. Now the pace slows down, with a number of choppy, disconnected scenes. Most of these scenes depict Lulu’s own submissive and humiliating, but passionate, infatuation for Yuddy, who responds disdainfully. Eventually the bored and frustrated Yuddy decides to head off to the Philippines to track down his real mother, who gave him up for adoption at birth and whom he has never been able to identify. When Lulu learns of Yuddy’s departure, she angrily trashes his apartment and walks out, with the lovelorn Zeb trailing after her. But Lulu rejects Zeb’s faithfulness – she only wants the cool dude, Yuddy, not kindness. So Zeb responds by beating her, probably thinking that treating women that way, as Yuddy does, is the only way to be successful with them.
  5. The Philippine termination. Yuddy finally arrives in the Philippines, but he is unsuccessful in finding his mother. Unlike the previous four acts, all of which take place almost exclusively at night, this act is mostly set in the daytime. One day Tide, who has quit his job as a policeman and is now a sailor newly arrived in the Philippines, finds Yuddy passed out on the street and takes him back to his apartment. (This meeting seems extremely contrived, but the actors managed to pull it off with relative aplomb.) Yuddy later meets some gangsters at the train station (Tide just happens to be in the vicinity, too) in order to buy a stolen US passport for himself, and in the middle of the negotiation, he grabs it and runs away. A brutal fight breaks out, during which Tide, conveniently there to help out, shoots a few gangsters. They both escape and hop onto a departing train. They haven’t completely escaped, though, because a hood shows up on the train and shoots the snoozing Yuddy and then disappears. With Yuddy now dying, Tide and Yuddy talk about life. Tide, having learned from Li-zhen about the minute at 3:00, April 16, 1960, asks Yuddy if he remembers it. Yuddy says yes, but that if Tide meets Li-zhen again to tell her that he doesn’t remember it. The movie then ends with separate shots of Lulu, having just arrived in the Philippines in search of Yuddy, and Li-zhen back in Hong Kong and apparently trying to phone the now-departed Tide. All connections have been missed, and all the characters are adrift.
At the very end, there is a coda that seems to have no meaning or connection with the rest of the film. Tony Leung, not previously seen, is shown in the Philippines train grooming himself like the cool dude Yuddy and apparently preparing to engage in some gambling at the train card table. For some reason, this character is linked to the characters Tony Leung played in Wong Kar Wai’s later, In the Mood for Love (2000) and 2046 (2004).

Days of Being Wild is pervasively gloomy. Yuddy, spoiled from his privileged upbringing, apparently puts the blame for his aimlessness on his illegitimacy. He doesn’t belong anywhere, and the end of his journey does not bring any enlightenment. Tide, the other important male character, rejects Yuddy’s obsessive egotism, but he is a rather unreflective, conventional sort and doesn’t project any positive alternative to Yuddy’s nihilism. So without much character development or resolved narrative conflicts, it is not surprising, then, that Days of Being Wild was not a big hit at the box office. Nevertheless, Wong Kar Wai has his admirers, and I am one of them. So, too, must be much of the Hong Kong Film Awards committee, since “Days of Being Wild” won the 1991 awards for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor (Cheung), Best Art Direction, and Best Cinematography.

What makes the film appealing may perhaps be different aspects for different viewers. Some of today’s viewers may be fascinated by the role of the self-absorbed Yuddy, played by the boyishly handsome, Leslie Cheung, who was also a big-time Cantopop music star. And added scrutiny of Cheung’s performance may arise if viewers are mindful of his bisexual lifestyle and the fact that he later committed suicide in 2003. But even though the role of Yuddy provides the unifying thread, the real focus of the film is on the roles of the two girlfriends, played by Maggie Cheung and Carina Lau. To see these two beautiful women so openly and hopelessly in love, so vulnerable to the face-losing pains of rejection, is what stirs the emotions of many of the male viewers. The entire movie conjures up the feelings of loneliness in the big city – the crowded close quarters, where human interactions are frequent, but meaningless. It’s always nighttime in the urban jungle, with empty gestures, missed connections, and the waiting for fulfilment that never comes. In Days of Being Wild, these moments of melancholy are heightened and exaggerated, the way a rhapsodic musical piece can intensify the feelings of sadness.

But although Wong Kar Wai mapped out the cinematic architecture of melancholy, Days of Being Wild was not without flaws. For example, the narrational perspective of the silent witness (the audience) is relatively detached from everyone involved: from the two girlfriends and from the two men. The two girlfriends are seen very much from the outside, basically from an observing man’s perspective. Yuddy is opaque and difficult to empathise with, while Tide is taciturn and unreflective. So there is no protagonist with whom the viewer can closely identify, or at least share some common concerns. Nevertheless, it did evoke a (perhaps overly hopeful) belief of more promising film experiences to come.
★★★